SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
                Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:
[ ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement           [ ]  Confidential, For Use of the
[X]  Definitive Proxy Statement                 Commission Only (as permitted
[ ]  Definitive Additional Materials            by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to
     Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

                              Meritage Corporation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]  No fee required.
[ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction  computed  pursuant
     to Exchange  Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
     calculated and state how it was determined):

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5)   Total fee paid:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided  by  Exchange  Act
    Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting fee was
    paid  previously.  Identify the previous filing by  registration  statement
    number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

    1)   Amount previously paid:
                                ------------------------------------------
    2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
                                                      --------------------
    3)   Filing Party:
                      ----------------------------------------------------
    4)   Date Filed:
                    ------------------------------------------------------

                    [MERITAGE CORPORTATION LOGO]

                           NOTICE AND PROXY STATEMENT
                       FOROF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

                          DATE: WEDNESDAY, MAY 10, 20009, 2001
                                 TIME: 9:00 A.M.
                     LOCATION: THE UNIVERSITY CLUB
                              13350 DALLAS PARKWAY
                               DALLAS, TEXAS 75240HILTON SCOTTSDALE RESORT
                           6333 NORTH SCOTTSDALE ROAD
                            SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85254

To Our Stockholders:

     The Management ofYou are invited to attend the Meritage  Corporation  cordially invites you to attend our
20002001 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders for the following purposes:

     1.   To elect threefour Class I directorsII  Directors,  each to hold office for a two-year
          term;

     2.   To  approve  an  amendment  to our 1997  Stock  Optionthe  Meritage   Corporation  2001  Executive   Management
          Incentive Plan so that the compensation  paid thereunder will increasebe fully
          deductible by the total  number of shares  authorized  for  issuance  from
          475,000 to 775,000, and the number of shares that may be issued to any
          one person under the plan from 50,000 to 100,000.  This amendment will
          also authorize the full Board of non-employee  Directors to administer
          the plan;Company;

     3.   To  transact  any other  business  that may  properly  come before the
          meeting.

     Only  stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 200030, 2001 are
entitled  to notice  of and to vote at the  annual  meeting.  A copy of our 19992000
Annual Report to Stockholders,  which includes audited financial statements,  is
enclosed.

                                        By Order of the Board of Directors

                                        /s/ Larry W. Seay

Scottsdale, Arizona                     Larry W. Seay
March 31, 200030, 2001                          Secretary


                             YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
          PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY. A POSTAGE PAID
             ENVELOPE IS PROVIDED FOR MAILING IN THE UNITED STATES.

                              MERITAGE CORPORATION
                           6613 NORTH SCOTTSDALE ROAD
                                    SUITE 200
                            SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85250

                           -----------------------------------------
                                 PROXY STATEMENT
                           -----------------------------------------

     This  Proxy   Statement  is  furnished  to  you  in  connection   with  the
solicitation  of  proxies  to be  used  in  voting  at  our  Annual  Meeting  of
Stockholders  on May 10, 2000.9, 2001.  THE MERITAGE  BOARD OF  DIRECTORS  IS  SOLICITING
THIS
PROXY.PROXIES.  The proxy  materials  relating to the annual meeting were mailed on or
about April 5, 20002001 to  stockholders of record at the close of business on March
31, 200030, 2001 (the "record date"). You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is
exercised by attending the annual  meeting and voting in person,  duly executing
and  delivering  a proxy  bearing a later  date,  or sending  written  notice of
revocation to the Corporate Secretary at the above address.

     We will bear the entire cost of proxy  solicitation,  including charges and
expenses of brokerage firms and others for forwarding  solicitation  material to
beneficial  owners of our  outstanding  common  stock.  We may  solicit  proxies
through the mail, by personal interview or telephone.

                          VOTING SECURITIES OUTSTANDING

     As of the record date, there were 5,326,1295,143,019 shares of Meritage common stock
outstanding.  Each share is entitled to one vote on each  proposal at the annual
meeting.  Only holders of record of common stock at the close of business on the
record date will be  permitted  to vote at the  meeting,  either in person or by
valid proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as shares that are
present  and  entitled  to vote for  purposes of  determining  a quorum,  but as
unvoted for purposes of determining the approval of any matter.

     The  following  information  should  be  reviewed  along  with the  audited
consolidated  financial statements,  notes to consolidated financial statements,
independent  auditors' reports and other information included in our 19992000 Annual
Report that was mailed to you along with this Proxy Statement.

                                        12

                              ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
                                (PROPOSAL NO. 1)

     Our Board of Directors  has seven  members.  The directors are divided into
two classes serving  staggered  two-year terms. This year our Class III directors
are up for election.  The Board has nominated Steven J.  Hilton,  William  W.
CleverlyJohn R. Landon,  Robert G. Sarver,
C. Timothy  White and Raymond  Oppel,Peter L. Ax, who are  incumbent  Class III  Directors,  for
re-election. Alan  Hamberlin,Mr. Ax was appointed as a current  Class I Director will not stand for
re-election.in September 2000.

     All nominees have  consented to serve as directors.  The Board of Directors
has no reason to believe that any of the  nominees  should be unable to act as a
director.  However,  if a nominee becomes unable to serve or if a vacancy should
occur  before  election,  the Board may either  reduce its size or  designate  a
substitute  nominee. If a substitute nominee is named, the proxies will vote for
the election of the substitute.

     The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present at
the annual meeting,Annual Meeting,  in person or by proxy,  and entitled to vote is required to
elect directors.  Unless you tell us on the proxy card to vote  differently,  we
will vote your signed retunedand returned proxies FOR the Board's nominees.

                        THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
                      THAT YOUA VOTE FOR THESE NOMINEES.

                                        2"FOR" APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 1.

                                        3

                        DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INFORMATION

     STEVEN J. HILTON has served as co-chairman and co-chief  executive  officer
(or  co-managing  director)  since  April 1998 and served as our  president  and
co-chief  executive  officer from December 31, 1996 to April 1998. In 1985,  Mr.
Hilton co-founded Monterey Homes, which merged with Homeplex Mortgage Investment
Co., the Company's  predecessor,  and was its treasurer,  secretary and director
until  December  31,  1996.  Mr.  Hilton  is a  member  of the  Central  Arizona
Homebuilders' Association and the National Homebuilders' Association.

     JOHN R. LANDON has served as co-chairman and co-chief executive officer (or
co-managing director) since April 1998 and served as our chief operating officer
and co-chief executive officer from the combination of Legacy Homes and Meritage
in July 1997 to April 1998.  Mr. Landon founded Legacy Homes in 1987 and, as its
president, managed all aspects of the company's business. Mr. Landon is a member
of the National  Association of  Homebuilders  and the Dallas Home and Apartment
Builders' Association.

     STEVEN J. HILTON has served as co-chairman and co-chief  executive  officer
(or  co-managing  director)  since  April 1998 and served as our  president  and
co-chief  executive  officer from December 31, 1996 to April 1998. In 1985,  Mr.
Hilton co-founded Monterey Homes, which merged with Homeplex Mortgage Investment
Co., the Company's  predecessor,  and was its treasurer,  secretary and director
until  December  31,  1996.  Mr.  Hilton  is a  member  of the  Central  Arizona
Homebuilders' Association,  the National Homebuilders' Association, the National
Board of Realtors and the Scottsdale Board of Realtors.

     WILLIAM W.  CLEVERLY has served as a director  since  December 31, 1996. He
served as co-chairman and co-chief  executive officer (or co-managing  director)
from  April  1998 to March  1999,  and as  chairman  of the board  and  co-chief
executive officer from December 31, 1996 to April 1998. Mr. Cleverly  co-founded
Monterey  Homes in 1985,  and was its president and director  until December 31,
1996. Mr. Cleverly is the chief executive officer of Inca Capital, a real estate
finance  and  investment  company  and  is  a  member  of  the  Central  Arizona
Homebuilders' Association and the National Homebuilders' Association.

     ALAN D. HAMBERLIN has served as a director since the Company's inception in
1988,  as chief  executive  officer of the Company from 1988 until  December 31,
1996 and as chairman of the board of  directors  from 1990 to December 31, 1996.
He was also the Company's president from 1988 until 1995. Mr. Hamberlin has been
president of Courtland Homes, Inc., a Phoenix,  Arizona residential homebuilder,
since 1983.  Mr.  Hamberlin is also a director of American  Southwest  Financial
Corporation,  American  Southwest  Finance Co.,  American  Southwest  Affiliated
Companies and of American Southwest Holdings, Inc.

     RAYMOND  OPPEL has served as a director  since  December  1997. In 1982, he
co-founded and became chairman and chief executive  officer of the Oppel Jenkins
Group,  a regional  homebuilder  in Texas and New Mexico,  which was sold to the
public  homebuilder  Kaufman & Broad,  Inc.KB Home, in 1995.  Mr. Oppel has served as president of the
Texas Panhandle Builder's  Association and is a licensed real estate broker. Mr.
Oppel  currently  is active as a private  investor in real  estate  development,
banking and a new automobile dealership.

     ROBERT G. SARVER has served as a director since December 1996, and has been
the  chairman and chief  executive  officer of  California  Bank and Trust since
1998.  From 1995 to 1998, he served as chairman of Grossmont Bank. Mr. Sarver is
currently a director of Skywest Airlines and Zion's  Bancorporation,  a publicly
held bank holding company.  In 1990, Mr. Sarver  co-founded and currently serves
as the executive  director of Southwest  Value Partners and  Affiliates,  a real
estate investment company. In 1984, Mr. Sarver founded National Bank of Arizona,
Inc. and was its President  until its  acquisition by Zion's  Bancorporation  in
1994.

     C. TIMOTHY WHITE has served as a director  since  December 1996, and served
as a director of Monterey Homes from February 1995 until  December  1996.  Since
1989, Mr. White has been an attorney with the law firm of Tiffany & Bosco,  P.A.
in Phoenix, Arizona, which provides legal services to Meritage.

     PETER  L. AX has  served  as a  director  since  September  2000 and is the
managing partner of Phoenix Capital  Management,  a  Scottsdale-based  financial
consulting  firm. Mr. Ax is the former chairman and chief  executive  officer of
SpinCycle,   Inc.,   the  nation's   largest   consolidator   and  developer  of
coin-operated  laundromats.  Mr.  Ax  is  the  exclusive  financial  advisor  to
Cleanwave,  LLC, an  internet-based  provider of laundry services owned by Shell
Chemical, a division of Royal Dutch Shell and SpinCycle,  Inc. Mr. Ax is also on
the Board of Directors of CashX and of Takos.com.  Prior to his  involvement  in
these  companies Mr. Ax served as head of the private equity division and senior
vice  president  of Lehman  Brothers in New York.  Mr. Ax is a certified  public
accountant  and holds an M.B.A.  from the Wharton  School at the  University  of
Pennsylvania.

     LARRY  W.  SEAY  has   served   as  chief   financial   officer   and  vice
president-finance  since December 31, 1996, and has also served as our secretary
and  treasurer  since  1997.  Mr.  Seay was  chief  financial  officer  and vice
president-finance  of Monterey Homes from April 1996 to December 31, 1996.  From
1990 to 1996, Mr. Seay served as vice president/treasurer of UDC Homes, Inc. In
May 1995,  UDC filed for  bankruptcy  protection  under  Chapter  11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy  Code and emerged from  reorganization  proceedings in November 1995.
Mr.
Seay is a certified public accountant and a member of the American  Institute of
Certified Public Accountants.

                                        3


     RICHARD T.  MORGAN has served as vice  president  since April 1998 and also
served as chief  financial  officer of our Texas  division  since July 1997. Mr.
Morgan joined  Legacy Homes in 1989 as  controller,  and was appointed  Legacy's
chief financial officer in 1997.

                                        4
STOCK OWNED BY PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The  following  table  summarizes,  as of March 31, 2000,30,  2001,  the  number and
percentage of outstanding  shares of our common stock  beneficially owned by the
following:

     *    each person or group management knows to beneficially own more than 5%
          of such stock;
     *    all Meritage directors and nominees for director;
     *    all  executive  officers  named  in  the  compensation  summary  under
          "Executive Compensation";
     *    all Meritage directors and executive officers as a group.

     The address  for our  directors  and  executive  officers  is c/o  Meritage
Corporation,  6613 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 200, Scottsdale,  Arizona 85250.
The number of shares  includes  shares of common  stock  owned of record by such
person's minor children and spouse and by other related individuals and entities
over whose shares of common stock such person has custody, voting control or the
power of disposition.

RIGHT TO NUMBER ACQUIRE TOTAL PERCENT OF NAME OF OF SHARES BY MAY 31, BENEFICIAL OUTSTANDING BENEFICIAL OWNER AGE POSITION WITH COMPANY OWNED 2000 SHARES SHARES(1) -Number Right To Total Percent of Name of of Shares Acquire by Beneficial Outstanding Beneficial Owner Age Position with Company Owned May 30, 2001 Shares Shares (1) ---------------- --- --------------------- ----- ---------------- ------ ------------------- Steven J. Hilton 39 Class I Director, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO 662,341 180,907 843,248 15.9% John R. Landon 4243 Class II Director, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO 666,667(2) 102,111 768,778 14.2% Steven J. Hilton 38647,267(2) 180,907 828,174 15.6% William W. Cleverly 44 Class I Director Co-Chairman and Co-CEO 705,601 172,667 878,268 16.0% William W. Cleverly 43 Class I Director 708,934 166,667 875,601 15.9% Alan D. Hamberlin 51 Class I Director 53,009(3) 320,226 373,235 6.6%298,341 136,667 435,008 8.3% Robert G. Sarver 3839 Class II Director, Audit and 286,300(3) 10,000 296,300 5.8% Compensation Committee 170,700(4) 7,500 178,200 3.3% C. Timothy White 3940 Class II Director 3,316 7,500 10,81610,000 13,316 * Ray Oppel 4344 Class I Director, Audit and 15,000 10,000 25,000 * Compensation Committee 15,000 7,500 22,500 *Peter L. Ax 42 Class II Director, Audit and -- -- -- Compensation Committee Larry W. Seay 4445 Chief Financial Officer, Vice President- 3,700 7,000 10,7007,400 7,500 14,900 * Finance,President-Finance, Secretary and Treasurer Richard T. Morgan 4445 Vice President 3,500 7,000 10,50012,000 15,500 * All directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons) 2,330,427 798,171 3,128,598 51.1% Wellington1,923,465 547,981 2,471,446 46.8% Alan D. Hamberlin 5333 N. 7th St., Phoenix AZ 85014 320,226(4) -- 320,226 6.2% Fidelity Management & Research Co., LLP 75 State 82 Devonshire Street, Boston MA, 02109 304,000(5)270,000(5) -- 304,000 5.7%270,000 5.3%
- ---------- * Represents less than 1%. (1) The percentages shown include the shares of common stock actually owned as of March 31, 2000,30, 2001, and the shares which the person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days of that date. In calculating the percentage of ownership, all shares of common stock which the identified person had the right to acquire within 60 days of March 31, 200030, 2001 upon exercise of options, are considered as outstanding for computing the percentage of the shares owned by that person or group, but are not considered as outstanding for computing the percentage of the shares of stock owned by any other person. (2) All 666,667647,267 shares are owned with Eleanor Landon, spouse, as tenants-in-common. (3) Mr. Hamberlin indirectly beneficially owns 12,633 shares through a partnership. (4) Mr. Sarver beneficially owns 1,500 shares through his spouse and 500 shares through a minor child. (4) Based on Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on October 31, 2000. Alan D. Hamberlin has sole voting power with respect to 320,226 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to those shares. Mr. Hamberlin is a former director of the Company. (5) Based on Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on February 9, 2000. Wellington14, 2001. Fidelity Management Company, LLP& Research Co. ("WMC"Fidelity") has shared voting powerbeneficial ownership with respect to 268,000270,000 shares and sharedsole dispositive power with respect to 304,000those 270,000 shares. The shares as to which the Schedule 13G is filed by WMC,FMR Corporation, in its capacity as the parent holding company of Fidelity, an investment advisor to various investment companies, are owned by clients of WMC who have the right to receive or the power to direct the dividends from or proceeds of such shares.one investment company, Fidelity Low Priced Stock Funds. The Schedule 13G also states that noneFidelity carries out the voting of WMC's clients are known to have such right or power with respect to more than 5%the shares under written guidelines established by the Funds' Boards of our common stock. 4Trustees. 5 MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS met six times in 1999.fiscal 2000. Each director attended at least 75% of his Board and committee meetings. THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE reviews the performance of management and will, at the appropriate times, review the structure of management and plans for management succession. The Committee also reviews and approves the Company's compensation policies and administers Meritage's Stock Option Plan. If approved by the Stockholders, the Committee will administer the Meritage 2001 Executive Management Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee, consisting of Mr. Oppel, Mr. Sarver and Mr. Ax, all non-employee directors, was formed in the fourth quarter of 2000, and began meeting in 2001. Prior to the formation of the Committee, the entire Board decided upon compensation matters. THE AUDIT COMMITTEE recommends appointment of our independent auditors, reviews our financial statements and considers other matters in relation to the external audit of financial affairs to promote accurate and timely reporting. The audit committee consists of Mr. Oppel, Mr. Sarver and Mr. Sarver, bothAx, all non-employee directors, and met four times during 1999fiscal 2000. OTHER COMMITTEES. We do not maintain a compensation committee, a standing nominating committee or other committee performing similar functions. The entire Board performs those duties. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $12,000$13,000 in 1999,2000, except Mr. Cleverly.Ax. Mr. CleverlyAx was a Meritage employee duringappointed to the first partBoard of 1999,Directors in September of 2000, and therefore received a retainer only for the period he was not employed by us,served in that position, which amounted to $8,000.$4,400. Non-employee directors receive no additional compensation for attending Board or committee meetings. In 1997 and 1999, each non-employee director was granted options to acquire 5,000 shares of our common stock as additional consideration for their services. TheMr. Ax was granted options in January 2,000 to acquire 2000 shares of our common stock as additional consideration for his services. All non-employee director stock options vest in equal 2,500 share increments on each of the first two anniversary dates of the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the stock on the grant date. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table summarizes the compensation we paid in 1999, 1998, and 1997 to our co-chief executive officers and other most highly compensated executive officers 1999 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM COMPENSATION ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS ------------------- ---------- ALL OTHER NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS OPTIONS(#) COMPENSATION --------------------------- ---- -------- -------- ---------- ------------ John R. Landon - Co-Chairman and Co- 1999 $375,000 $200,000 30,000 $26,004 Chief Executive Officer 1998 210,000 200,000 -- 22,183 1997 200,000 200,000 166,667 11,700 Steven J. Hilton - Co-Chairman and Co- 1999 375,000 200,000 30,000 33,212 Chief Executive Officer 1998 210,000 200,000 -- 30,438 1997 200,000 200,000 -- 31,905 William W. Cleverly - Director* 1999 55,125 200,000 -- 8,764 1998 210,000 200,000 -- 35,108 1997 200,000 200,000 -- 31,905 Larry W. Seay - Chief Financial Officer, 1999 150,000 95,937 20,000 12,611 Vice President-Finance, Secretary and 1998 120,726 90,000 -- 9,884 Treasurer 1997 113,750 85,000 12,500 6,575 Richard T. Morgan - Vice President 1999 110,833 60,000 10,000 1,237 1998 97,167 54,000 -- 1,272 1997 89,500 35,000 10,000 1,200
* For the fiscal years ended December 31, 1997 and 1998 Mr. Cleverly served as a co-chief executive officer or co-managing director. He resigned as an officer in March 1999 and his separation agreement is described herein under the "Board of Director's Report on Executive Compensation." 5 1999 OPTION GRANTS The following table lists stock options granted in 1999 to the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts shown as potential realizable values rely on arbitrarily assumed share price appreciation rates prescribed by the SEC over the seven-year term of the options. In assessing those values, please note that the ultimate value of the options depends on actual future share values and do not necessarily reflect management's assessment of our future stock price performance. The potential realizable values are not intended to indicate the value of the options.
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS ------------------------------------------------ PERCENTAGE POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE AT OF TOTAL ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK SHARES OPTIONS PRICE APPRECIATION UNDERLYING GRANTED TO EXERCISE OR FOR OPTION TERM OPTIONS EMPLOYEES BASE PRICE EXPIRATION ------------------------------ NAME GRANTED(#) IN 1999 ($/SHARE) DATE 0% 5% 10% ---- ---------- ------- --------- ---- ------- -------- -------- John R. Landon 30,000 11% $15.68 1/12/06 -- $131,135 $362,677 Steven J. Hilton 30,000 11% $15.68 1/12/06 -- 131,135 362,677 Larry W. Seay 20,000 8% $14.25 1/12/06 -- 116,024 270,384 Richard T. Morgan 15,000 6% $14.25 1/12/06 -- 87,018 202,788
This table excludes options granted to Mr. Cleverly in 1999, which were forfeited upon his resignation effective March 18, 1999. AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 1999 AND OPTION VALUES AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1999 The following table lists the number of shares acquired and the value realized as a result of options exercised during 1999 for the listed officers. The table contains values for "in the money" options, which are those with a positive spread between the exercise price and the December 31, 1999 share price of $10.875. The values are the difference between the year-end price per share and the exercise price per share, multiplied by the number of applicable shares in the money. These values have not been and may never be realized. The options may never be exercised, and the value, if any, will depend on the share price on the exercise date.
NUMBER OF UNEXERCISED VALUE OF UNEXERCISED IN-THE- OPTIONS AT FISCAL MONEY OPTIONS AT FISCAL SHARES YEAR END(#) YEAR END($) ACQUIRED ON VALUE --------------------------- --------------------------- NAME EXERCISE(#) REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE ---- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- John R. Landon -- -- 102,111 94,556 $540,624 $396,878 Steven J. Hilton -- -- 172,667 24,000 937,502 -- William W. Cleverly -- -- 166,667 -- 937,502 -- Larry W. Seay 3,700 $ 24,994 7,000 21,500 10,510 21,020 Richard T. Morgan -- -- 7,000 18,000 9,500 14,250
6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OVERVIEW AND PHILOSOPHY. Our compensation program for executive officers primarily consists of base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants. Executives also participate in various other benefit plans generally available to all company employees, including a medical and 401(k) plan. Our philosophy is to pay base salaries that enable us to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executives. The annual bonus program is designed to reward performance based on financial results. Stock option grants are intended to provide substantial rewards to executives if stockholders benefit from stock price appreciation, and no reward if the stock price does not appreciate. CONTRACTUAL COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS. Our two co-chairmen, Steven J. Hilton and John R. Landon, both serve as chief executive officers. Mr. Hilton and Mr. Landon have employment agreements with us, which provide for a base salary, stock options and bonuses based on company performance. Our prior Board of Directors negotiated an employment agreement and a related stock option agreement with Mr. Hilton effective December 31, 1996, in connection with the merger of Monterey Homes, an Arizona-based homebuilding business, into the Company. Mr. Hilton was a shareholder of Monterey Homes before the merger. The employment agreement and stock option agreement were integral factors in Mr. Hilton's decision to proceed with the merger and assume management of Meritage. Mr. Hilton's compensation package is more fully described under "Employment Agreements." In July 1997, we combined with Legacy Homes, a Texas based homebuilding business owned by John and Eleanor Landon. In connection with the combination, we negotiated an employment agreement and related stock option agreement with Mr. Landon, under which Mr. Landon was appointed chief operating officer and co-chief executive officer and was granted stock options. Mr. Landon's agreement also included provisions for us to pay him additional consideration not to exceed $15 million, based on our earnings. Additional consideration was approximately $2.8 million in 1997 and $7.0 million in 1998, and was paid subsequent to each year-end. Our Board of Directors removed the contingent nature of the remaining $5.2 million in 1999, which was paid to Mr. Landon in January 2000. The successful negotiation of the employment agreement and other related agreements was an integral part of Mr. Landon's decision to combine Legacy Homes with the Company and become part of our management team. Mr. Landon's compensation package is more fully described under "Employment Agreements." William Cleverly, a shareholderstockholder of Monterey Homes before the merger, resigned as a managing director effective March 18, 1999. Mr. Cleverly continues to serve on our Board of Directors and as a consultant to us. In connection with Mr. Cleverly's resignation, Meritage and Mr. Cleverly entered into a separation and consulting agreement. Under this agreement, we purchased Mr. Cleverly's employment agreement (which is described below under "Employment Agreements") for $656,375, an amount equal to his salary through the end of his employment term and his pro-rated bonus through March 31, 1999. Mr. Cleverly remained entitled to the contingent stock he was granted in connection with the merger of Monterey Homes with the Company in 1996 and to the stock options he was granted under his 1996 stock option agreement, which contains terms identical to Mr. Hilton's stock option agreement. The separation iswas deemed a termination without cause under Mr. Cleverly's employment agreement. For three years from the effective date of the separation agreement, Mr. Cleverly willagreed to consult on our new product development and other areas agreed upon by the parties. Mr. Cleverly willis not be required to spend more than 25 hours per month in his capacity as our consultant. The separation agreement contains a non-compete provision that prohibits Mr. Cleverly from competing with us for three years following the effective date, subject to various exceptions. In consideration for Mr. Cleverly's agreement not to compete, he will be paid a total of $285,000 in quarterly installments of $23,750. As of December 31, 1999,2000, we have paid Mr. Cleverly $71,250$166,250 of this amount. For five years from the effective date of the separation agreement, Mr. Cleverly will be nominated for election to our Board of Directors, so long as he owns at least 275,000 shares of our stock or unless he has committed any act that constitutes "cause" as defined in his previous employment agreement. 7 In connection with the separation agreement, both Mr. Cleverly and Meritage released the other party from any liabilities or obligations either party had or may have against such party in the future, subject to certain exceptions. STOCK6 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table summarizes the compensation we paid in 2000, 1999 and 1998 to our Co-Chief Executive Officers and other most highly compensated executive officers 2000 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Long-Term Compensation Annual Compensation Awards -------------------- Other Annual ----------- All Other Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation Options (#) Compensation(1) --------------------------- ---- -------- -------- ------------ ----------- --------------- Steven J. Hilton - Co-Chairman and Co- 2000 $400,000 $975,597 -- 11,200 $35,005 Chief Executive Officer 1999 375,000 475,000 -- 30,000 33,212 1998 210,000 200,000 -- -- 33,438 John R. Landon - Co-Chairman and Co- 2000 400,000 975,597 -- 11,200 63,257 Chief Executive Officer 1999 375,000 475,000 -- 30,000 26,004 1998 210,000 200,000 -- -- 22,183 Larry W. Seay - Chief Financial Officer, 2000 161,428 175,000 -- 7,500 14,654 Vice President-Finance, Secretary and 1999 150,000 125,000 -- 20,000 12,611 Treasurer 1998 120,726 95,937 -- -- 9,884 Richard T. Morgan - Vice President 2000 122,500 80,000 -- -- 5,334 1999 110,833 60,000 -- 15,000 1,237 1998 97,167 54,000 -- -- 1,272
- ---------- (1) These amounts represent matching contributions by the Company to the officers' accounts under the 401(k) plan, group health and life plan premiums and Company automobile allowances. 2000 OPTION PLAN.GRANTS The following table lists stock options granted in 2000 to the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts shown as potential realizable values rely on arbitrarily assumed share price appreciation rates prescribed by the SEC over the five or seven-year term of the options. In assessing those values, please note that the ultimate value of the options depends on actual future share values and do not necessarily reflect management's assessment of our future stock price performance. The potential realizable values are not intended to indicate the value of the options.
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation Individual Grants for Option Term --------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- Percentage of Total Shares Options Underlying Granted to Exercise or Options Employees Base Price Expiration Name Granted (#) in 2000 ($/Share) Date 0% 5% 10% ---- ----------- ------- --------- ------- ---- ------- ------- Steven J. Hilton 11,200 12% $11.00 1/11/05 -- $19,744 $57,177 John R. Landon 11,200 12% 11.00 1/11/05 -- 19,744 57,177 Larry W. Seay 7,500 8% 10.00 1/11/07 -- 30,533 71,154 Richard T. Morgan -- -- -- -- -- -- --
No stock appreciation rights have been granted under the Meritage Stock Option Plan. 7 AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 2000 AND OPTION VALUES AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 The following table lists the number of shares acquired and the value realized as a result of options exercised during 2000 for the listed officers. The table contains values for "in the money" options, which are those with a positive spread between the exercise price and the December 31, 2000 share price of $37.25. The values are the difference between the year-end price per share and the exercise price per share, multiplied by the number of applicable shares in the money. These values have not been and may never be realized. The options may never be exercised, and the value, if any, will depend on the share price on the exercise date.
Number of Unexercised Value of Unexercised Options at Fiscal In-the-Money Options at Year End (#) Fiscal Year End ($) Shares --------------------------- --------------------------- Acquired On Value Name Exercise (#) Realized Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable ---- ------------ -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Steven J. Hilton -- -- 172,667 35,200 $5,462,793 $ 811,794 John R. Landon -- -- 172,667 35,200 5,462,793 811,794 Larry W. Seay -- -- 7,500 28,500 193,885 717,145 Richard T. Morgan -- -- 9,000 16,000 241,500 391,000
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE SOLICITING MATERIAL AND SHOULD NOT BE DEEMED FILED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY OTHER COMPANY FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THE COMPANY SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATES THIS REPORT. It is the duty of the Compensation Committee to review and determine the salaries and bonuses of executive officers of the Company, including the Company's Co-Chief Executive Officers, and to establish the general compensation policies for such individuals. The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation programs for the executive officers should reflect the Company's performance and the value created for our stockholders. In addition, our compensation programs should support the goals and values of the Company and should reward individual contributions to the Company's success. GENERAL COMPENSATION POLICY AND PHILOSOPHY. Our philosophy is to provide the Company's executive officers with compensation that is based on their individual performance and the financial performance of the Company, and that is competitive enough to attract and retain highly skilled individuals. Each officer's compensation is comprised of: * a base salary; * performance bonuses designed to reward performance based on financial results; and * stock-based incentives designed to tie the executive officers' overall compensation to the interests of the Company's stockholders by providing substantial rewards to executives if stockholders benefit from stock price appreciation, and no reward if the stock price does not appreciate. Executives also participate in various other benefit plans generally available to all company employees, including a medical and 401(k) plan. The Company attempts to set executive compensation at levels that are competitive within the industry. Each year the Company reviews executive compensation against publicly available information for other homebuilders. Periodically, the Company engages outside consultants to evaluate its compensation programs. A substantial portion of each executive's compensation is in the form of a bonus program. For most executives, the program is tied to an annual budget. The Company believes that tying compensation to financial performance aligns the interests of executives with those of stockholders. 8 In 1997, the Board of Directors and our stockholders approved the adoption of the Meritage Corporation Stock Option Plan. The plan authorizes grants of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to executives, directors and consultants as selected by the Board. Subject to stockholder approval of Proposal No. 2, theThe total number of shares of common stock available for awards under the plan is 775,000, and the maximum number of shares of common stock that can be issued to any one person under the plan is 100,000 shares. A summary of the plan is included under Proposal No. 2. The Board believes the plan promotes success and enhances our value, as it ties the personal interests of the participants to those of our stockholders, and provides the participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. The Board of Directors has the exclusive authority to administer the plan, including the power to determine the eligibility, the types of awards to be granted, the timing of the awards and the exercise price of awards. OTHER OPTIONS.CEO COMPENSATION. Our two Co-Chief Executive Officers, Steven J. Hilton and John R. Landon, have employment agreements with us, which provide for a base salary, stock options and bonuses based on company performance. Our prior Board of Directors negotiated an employment agreement and a related stock option agreement with Mr. Hilton effective December 31, 1996, in connection with the merger of Monterey Homes, an Arizona-based homebuilding business, into the Company. Mr. Hilton was a stockholder of Monterey Homes before the merger. The employment agreement and stock option agreement were integral factors in Mr. Hilton's decision to proceed with the merger and assume management of Meritage. Mr. Hilton's compensation package is more fully described under "Employment Agreements." In July 1997, we combined with Legacy Homes, a Texas based homebuilding business owned by John and Eleanor Landon. In connection with the combination, we negotiated an employment agreement and related stock option agreement with Mr. Landon, under which Mr. Landon was appointed chief operating officer and co-chief executive officer and was granted stock options. The employment agreement and other related agreements were integral factors in Mr. Landon's decision to combine Legacy Homes with the Company and become part of our management team. Mr. Landon's agreement also included provisions for us to pay him additional consideration based on our earnings. Portions of this additional consideration were paid in 1998 and 1999. Our Board of Directors removed the contingent nature of the remaining $5.2 million in 1999, which was paid to Mr. Landon in January 2000. Mr. Landon's compensation package is more fully described under "Employment Agreements." COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 162(M). Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) limits the deductibility of executive compensation paid by publicly held corporations to $1 million for each executive officer named in this proxy statement. The $1 million limitation generally does not apply to compensation that is pursuant to a performance-based plan approved by stockholders. In connection with their employment agreements, Messrs. Hilton and Landon were each granted options to purchase 166,667 shares of ourthe Company's common stock. These options vestvested over three-years. In 1994, the Internal Revenue Code was amended to add a limitation on the tax deduction a publicly held company may take on compensation aggregating more than $1 million for selected executives in any given year. The law and related regulation are subject to many qualifications and exceptions. Gains realized on non-qualified stock options, or incentive stock options that are subject to a "disqualifying disposition," are subject to new tax limitations unless they meet certain requirements. To date, we have not been subject to the deductibility limitation and have generally structured our equity-based compensation to comply with the performance-based compensation exception to the limitation. Mr. Hilton's stock options granted in connection with the merger were an integral part of his employment agreement and as an inducement for him to consummate the merger. Mr. Landon's stock options were granted in connection with the combination as an integral part of Mr. Landon's employment agreement and as an inducement for him to proceed with the transaction. None of the stock options granted to Messrs. Hilton or Landon satisfy the exceptions to the non-deductibility of tax or $1 million threshold described above. Accordingly, ifIn 2001 and 2002, 166,667 options each held by Messrs. Hilton and Landon with an exercise price of $5.25, will terminate and will need to be exercised. If as a result of substantial appreciation in our common stock and the exercise of substantial option holdings, Messrs. Hilton or Landon's compensation were to exceed $1 million in a given year, the excess may not be deductible. The compensation element of an option doesthese options do not result in a charge to earnings on our financial statements. In 2000, Messrs. Hilton and Landon were each paid in excess of $1 million. This excess did not qualify for deduction under Section 162(m) of the Code. This year, the Company's bonus plan is being submitted to stockholders to facilitate deductibility. See "Proposal No. 2 - Approval of Meritage Corporation 2001 Executive Management Incentive Plan." Robert G. Sarver Raymond Oppel Peter L. Ax 9 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE SOLICITING MATERIAL AND SHOULD NOT BE DEEMED FILED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY OTHER COMPANY FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THE COMPANY SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATES THIS REPORT. It is the duty of the Audit Committee to provide independent, objective oversight of the Company's accounting functions and internal controls. The Audit Committee is composed of independent directors, and acts under a written charter that sets forth the audit related functions the committee is to perform. You can find a copy of that charter attached to this proxy statement as Exhibit A. The audit functions of the Audit Committee are to: * serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the Company's financial reporting process and internal control system; * review and appraise the audit efforts of the Company's independent accountants; and * provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, financial and senior management, and the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee meets with management periodically to consider the adequacy of the Company's internal controls and the objectivity of its financial reporting. We discuss these matters with the Company's independent auditors and with appropriate Company financial personnel. We regularly meet privately with the independent auditors, who have unrestricted access to the Committee. We also recommend to the Board the appointment of the independent auditors and review periodically their performance and independence from management. We have considered the provision of additional services by our independent auditors and believe that the provision of such additional services does not adversely impact their independence. Although the Committee reviews the Company's financing plans and reports recommendation to the full Board for approval, management has primary responsibility for the Company's financial statements and the overall reporting process, including the Company's system of internal controls. The independent auditors audit the annual financial statements prepared by management, express an opinion as to whether those financial statements fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and discuss with us any issues they believe should be raised with us. This year, we reviewed the Company's audited financial statements and met with both management and KPMG LLP, the Company's independent auditors, to discuss those financial statements. Management has represented to us that the financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We have received from and discussed with KPMG LLP the written disclosure and the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees). These items relate to that firm's independence from the Company. We also discussed with KPMG LLP any matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees). Based on these reviews and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the Company's audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. Robert G. Sarver Raymond Oppel Peter L. Ax 10 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS We have employment agreements with Steven J. Hilton and John R. Landon that provide for terms through December 31, 2001 and June 30, 2001, respectively. Both agreements provide for an initialannual base salary of $200,000 per year (increasing by 5% of the prior year's base salary per year) and an annual bonus based on a percentage of consolidated net income, as determined by the Board of Directors. Mr. Hilton and Mr. Landon serve as our co-chairmen and co-chief executive officers. Under both agreements, if employment is terminated: * voluntarily or for cause, or with respect to Mr. Landon, voluntarily without good reason, we have no further obligation to pay the officers' salary or bonus; * without cause, or with respect to Mr. Landon, voluntarily for good reason, we are obligated to pay the officer his then current base salary through the term of his agreement; * due to death or permanent disability, we are obligated to pay the officer his then current salary for six months after termination, plus a pro rated bonus. "Cause" under both the Hilton and Landon agreements is defined to mean an act or acts of dishonesty constituting a felony and resulting or intended to result directly or indirectly in substantial personal gain or enrichment at our expense. "Cause" under the Landon agreement also includes willful disregard of 8 the employee's primary duties to the Company. "Good Reason" under the Landon agreement is defined to include: * assignment of duties inconsistent with the scope of the duties associated with Mr. Landon's titles or positions or which would require Mr. Landon to relocate his principal residence outside the Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas metropolitan area; * termination of Mr. Landon for cause and it is determined that cause did not exist; or * our failure to make certain working capital arrangements available to the Texas division. Both agreements contain non-compete provisions over their terms that restrict Mr. Hilton and Mr. Landon from: * engaging in the homebuilding business and, with respect to Mr. Landon, the mortgage brokerage or banking business; * recruiting, hiring or discussing employment with any person who is, or within the past six months was, a Meritage employee; * soliciting any customer or supplier of Meritage for a competing business or otherwise attempting to induce any customer or supplier to discontinue its relationship with us; or * except solely as a limited partner with no management or operating responsibilities, engaging in the land banking or lot development business. The foregoing provisions shalldo not restrict: * the ownership of less than 5% of a publicly-traded company; or * if the employment of either Mr. Hilton or Mr. Landon is terminated under his respective employment agreement, engaging in the custom homebuilding business, or the production homebuilding business outside a 100 mile radius of any Meritage project or outside Northern California, or engaging in the land banking or lot development business. The non-compete provisions survive the termination of the Hilton agreement unless Mr. Hilton is terminated without cause. The non-compete provisions under the Landon agreement survive termination of that agreement unless Mr. Landon is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason. 11 We also have an employment agreement with Larry W. Seay, our chief financial officer, that provides for a term through January 1, 2001.2002. Mr. Seay's agreement is designed to provide for a base salary and an annual bonus based on the achievement of specific performance objectives. Compensation is subject to continuing employment and standard employment policies. During the terms of the agreement, Mr. Seay agrees that he will not: * engage in the business of providing any homebuilding products or services where we do or propose to do business; * solicit for employment anyone who works for or contracts with Meritage for one year after the last date the employee is with the Company; * solicit or take away any of our customers or disclose potential customers to our competitors. If Mr. Seay is terminated without cause, he will be entitled to receive: * an amount equal to 50% of his base salary; * 50% of his average bonus for the previous three fiscal years; and * acceleration of his stock options as if he held them through the end of the following fiscal year. If Mr. Seay voluntarily terminates his employment within twelve months following a change of control of the Company due to a demotion in position, he will be entitled to receive: * an amount equal to 100% of his base salary; * 100% of his average bonus for the previous three fiscal years; and * vesting in full of all his stock options. 9 CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS If Meritage undergoes a change of control that is required to be reported on Form 8-K under securities laws before the third anniversary of the effective date of his stock option agreement, the options granted to Mr. Landon under his stock option agreement will vest in full and be immediately exercisable. We also have senior executive severance agreements under which, upon termination of employment within two years of a change of control, certain executive officers, including Messrs. Hilton, Landon, Seay and Morgan, will receive a cash payment equal to one or two times the highest annual compensation paid during the two years prior to termination, and accelerated vesting under our benefit and stock option plans. 1012 PERFORMANCE GRAPH In connection with the Company's merger with Monterey Homes on December 31, 1996, we terminated our REIT status and entered into the homebuilding business. We have not included a performance graphdata for 1995 and 1996, as the information for those yearsthat year is no longer relevant to our business. The chart below graphs our performance in the form of cumulative total return to stockholders since we began homebuilding as our primary business. Our total return is compared to that of the Standard and Poor's 500 Composite Stock Index and of a cumulative return on the common stock of seven publicly trade peer issuers, which includes Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Crossman Communities, Inc. Engle Homes, Inc,, Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc, MDC Holdings, Inc. NVR, Inc., and Washington Homes, Inc. (the "Peer Group"). Engle Homes, Inc., which was previously included in the Peer Group, was the subject of a tender offer and merger transaction in 2000, and as a result, its common stock is no longer publicly traded. Therefore, Engle Homes, Inc. has been removed from the Peer Group. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 1996 in Meritage common stock and in each of the other indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends. AS OF DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1996 1997 1998 1999 ----- ----- ----- -----2000 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Meritage Corporation 100 167.2 168.1 150.0 513.8 S&P 500 100 133.6 171.5 207.6 188.7 Peer Group 100 137.8 186.5 152.5 11153.4 197.3 238.8 217.1 [PERFORMANCE CHART] 13 SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Executive officers, directors and "beneficial owners" of more than ten percent of our common stock must file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 16(a). Based upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished to us, or written representations that all required forms were filed, management believes all filing requirements were met during 1999.2000. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS Since 1994, weWe have leased approximately 11,00012,000 square feet of office space in a Scottsdale, Arizona office building from a limited liability company owned by Messrs. Hilton and Cleverly.Cleverly since 1994. The five-year lease expires August 30, 2004, and we have an optionbuilding was sold to expand our spacethird parties in the building and renew the lease for additional terms at rates that are competitive with those in the market at such time.2000. Rents paid to the limited liability company totaled $43,852 in 2000, $238,240 in 1999, and $210,816 in 1998 and $192,487 in 1997. Management believes that the lease terms are no less favorable than those that could be negotiated in an arm's length transaction.1998. Since 1997, we have leased office space in Plano, Texas from Home Financial Services, a Texas partnership owned by John and Eleanor Landon. The lease expires May 15, 2002. Rents paid to the partnership were $185,613 in 2000, $176,773 in 1999 and $169,294 in 1998 and $81,588 in 1997. Management believes that the lease terms are no less favorable than those that could be negotiated in an arm's length transaction.1998. We paid legal fees to Tiffany & Bosco, P.A. of approximately $ 334,000311,000 in 19992000 and $321,000$334,000 in 1998.1999. C. Timothy White, one of our directors,Directors, is a shareholderpartner of Tiffany and Bosco, P.A. In 1999 we purchased 92 lots for development in Arizona from a business controlled by the spouse of one of our directors. The total amount paid for the lots was approximately $3,517,000, a price management believes is no less favorable than we could have negotiated in an arm's length transaction. In 1999 Mr. Landon personally purchased 27.25 acres of undeveloped land in Allen, Texas, on our behalf. Mr. Landon sold the land to Meritage later in the year at no gain. Our acquisition price of the property was $994,705. In 1999 we entered into a $70 million borrowing agreement with NorwestWells Fargo Bank and California Bank and Trust ("CBT"). that was increased to $100 million in 2000. This line of credit is duebegins to term out over a 24-month period beginning in December 31, 2001, has interest payable monthly approximating prime or LIBOR plus 1.75%, and is secured by first deeds of trust on real estate. Mr. Sarver, one of our directors, is the chairman and chief executive officer of CBT. In 2000 we purchased 42 lots for development in Arizona from a business controlled by William Cleverly, one of our Directors. The total amount paid for the lots was approximately $2,435,000. Management believes that the terms of the loan to beand fees nogotiated for all transactions listed above are no less favorable than wethose that could havebe negotiated in an armsarm's length transaction. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE AMENDMENT TO THEtransactions. APPROVAL OF MERITAGE CORPORATION STOCK OPTION2001 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN (PROPOSAL NO. 2) On January 12, 2000, ourThe Board of Directors has adopted subject to shareholder approval, an amendment to the Meritage Corporation 1997 Stock Option2001 Executive Management Incentive Plan that would increase the number(the "Plan"). The Plan will become effective as of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plan from 475,000 shares to 775,000 shares. The amendment would also increase the maximum amount of shares that could be issued to one person from 50,000 to 100,000, and allow the plan to be administered by all non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Certain material features of the plan are discussed below, however, the description isJanuary 1, 2001, subject to and qualifiedfurther approval by the full text of the plan, attached as Exhibit A, which includes the proposed amendment highlighted in bold. The closing price for our common stock on January 12, 2000, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $10.00 per share. The affirmative vote of athe holders of the majority of the shares of common stockCompany Common Stock present, at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy,represented, and entitled to vote, is requiredat the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. No award may be made under the Plan after its expiration date, but awards made prior thereto may extend beyond that date. The Plan will provide for annual incentive awards to approve the proposal. 12 The Board believes the plan promotes success and enhances our value, as it ties the personal interestscertain of the participantsCompany's key executives and is being submitted to those of stockholders and providesshareholders in an effort to assure that awards under the participants with an incentivePlan will be tax deductible for outstanding performance. The Board of Directors administers the plan, and has the exclusive authority over it, including the power to determine a participant's eligibility, the types of awards to be granted, the timing of the awards and the exercise price of awards. The Board believes that increasing the number of shares reserved for issuance and the maximum number of shares a person may be granted will enhance the plan's success and its impact on our value. GENERAL - DESCRIPTION OF AVAILABLE AWARDS INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS. An ISO is a stock option that satisfies the requirements specified inCompany. Section 422162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (the "Code"). Under the Code, ISOs may only be granted to employees. In order for an option to qualify as an ISO, the price payable to exercise the option must be equal or greater than the fair market value of the stock at the date of the grant, the option must expire no later than 10 years from the date of the grant, and the stock subject to ISOs that are first exercisable by an employee in any calendar year must not have places a value of more than $100,000 as of the grant date. Certain other requirements must also be met. The Board determines$1 million annual limit on the amount of consideration to becompensation paid to us upon exercisethe named executive officers that may be deducted by the Company for federal income tax purposes, unless such compensation is based on the achievement of any options. Paymentpre-established performance goal(s) set by the Compensation Committee pursuant to an incentive plan that has been approved by the Company's shareholders. Shareholder approval of the Plan is necessary for maintaining the tax-deductible status of incentive payments made to the participants. 14 We have summarized below the key provisions of the Plan. Because it is a summary, it may not contain all of the information that is important to you. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2001 Executive Management Incentive Plan, which is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN The Plan is designed to recognize and reward select Company executives for their contributions to the overall success of the Company. ELIGIBILITY Awards may be made in cash, common stock or other property. An optioneeunder the Plan to any employee of the Company who is not treated as receiving taxable income upon eithera "covered employee" within the grant ormeaning of Section 162(m) of the exercise of an ISO. However, the difference between the exercise priceCode. A covered employee may include Meritage's Co-Chief Executive Officers and the fair market valuefour other most highly compensated executive officers of the stock atCompany. Non-employee directors are not eligible to receive an award under the Plan. ADMINISTRATION The Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee or any other committee appointed by the Board of Directors (the "Committee"), which consists of not less than two non-employee directors who are "outside directors" within the meaning of Section 162(m). The Committee has full authority to interpret the Plan and to establish rules for its administration. The Committee has the authority to determine eligibility for participation in the Plan, to decide all questions concerning eligibility for and the amount of awards, and to establish and administer the performance goals (defined below) and certify whether, and to what extent, they are attained. DETERMINATION OF AWARDS In determining awards to be made under the Plan, the Committee may approve a formula that is based on one or more objective criteria to measure corporate performance as set forth in the Plan ("Performance Criteria"). The Committee may establish Performance Criteria and as selected by the Committee, the Committee may set annual performance objectives ("Performance Goals") with respect to such Performance Criteria for the Company. Performance Criteria must include one or more of the following: the Company's pre- or after-tax net earnings, revenue growth, operating income, operating cash flow, return on net assets, return on shareholders' equity, return on assets, return on capital, share price growth, shareholder returns, gross or net profit margin, earnings per share, price per share and market share, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms, or as compared to any incremental increase, or as compared to results of a peer group. The Committee will also determine the amount and form of compensation payable to the participant upon attainment of a Performance Goal before the beginning of each Performance Period or within the time permitted under Section 162(m) of exercisethe Code. Payment of awards will be made in cash. The Committee will make all determinations regarding the achievement of Performance Goals and the determination of actual awards. The Committee may in its discretion decrease, but not increase, the amount of any award that otherwise would be payable under the Plan. AMOUNT AVAILABLE AND MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL AWARDS The Committee shall determine the amount available for awards in any year. The maximum award payable to any employee for a performance period is an item$3,000,000. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION The Committee may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time with or without prior notice. In addition, the Committee may from time to time and with or without prior notice, amend or modify the Plan in any manner, but may not without shareholder approval adopt any amendment that would require the vote of tax preference atshareholders of the timeCompany pursuant to Section 162(m) of exercisethe Code. 15 FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES The amount of cash received by a participant is required to be recognized by such participant as ordinary income subject to withholding and will generally be allowed as a deduction to the Company. Section 162(m) limits the deduction of compensation in determining liability forexcess of $1 million per year paid to certain of the alternative minimum tax, assumingCompany's employees unless, among other exceptions, the compensation is performance-based compensation within the meaning of that provision. The Company believes that Section 162(m) will not limit the common stockdeduction of compensation payable pursuant to the Plan if the Plan is either transferable orapproved by the stockholders. The Plan is not subject to a substantial riskany provision of forfeiturethe Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and is not qualified under Section 83 of the Code. If at the time of exercise, the common stock is both nontransferable and is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the common stock (determined at the time the stock becomes either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture) will be a tax preference item in the year in which the stock becomes either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. If common stock acquired by the exercise of an ISO is not sold or otherwise disposed of within two years from the date of its grant and is held for at least one year after the date the stock is transferred to the optionee upon exercise, any gain or loss resulting from its disposition is treated as long-term capital gain or loss. If such common stock is disposed of before the expiration of the above-mentioned holding periods, a "disqualifying disposition" occurs. If a disqualifying disposition occurs, the optionee realizes ordinary income in the year of the disposition in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price, or the selling price of the common stock and the exercise price, whichever is less. The balance of the optionee's gain on a disqualifying disposition, if any, is taxed as a capital gain. We are not entitled to any tax deduction as a result of the grant or exercise of an ISO, or on a later disposition of the common stock received, except in the event of a disqualifying disposition. In such case, we are entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income realized by the optionee. NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS. An NQSO is any stock option other than an Incentive Stock Option. These options are referred to as "non-qualified" because they do not meet the requirements of, and are not eligible for, the favorable tax treatment provided by Section 422401(a) of the Code. The optionee realizes no taxablepreceding discussion of federal income upon the grant of an NQSO, nor are we entitled to a tax deduction by reason of such grant. Upon the exercise of an NQSO, the optionee realizes ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the common stock on the exercise date over the exercise price, and we are entitled to a corresponding tax deduction. Upon subsequent sale or other disposition of common stock acquired through exercise of an NQSO, the optionee realizes a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss to the extent of any intervening appreciation or depreciation. Such a resale by the optionee has no tax consequence to us. 13 CHANGE OF CONTROL Upon the occurrence of a Corporate Transaction (as defined in the plan), if the surviving corporation or the purchaserconsequences does not assume Meritage's obligation under the plan, all outstanding options shall become immediately exercisable in full and each option holder shallpurport to be given the opportunity to exercise their options before the consummationa complete analysis of the Corporate Transaction so that the option holder can participate in the Corporate Transaction. The Plan defines a "Corporate Transaction" to include: * a merger or consolidation in which Meritage is not the surviving entity; * the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Meritage in a liquidation or dissolutionpotential tax effects of the company;Plan. It is based upon laws, regulations, rulings and decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change. No information is provided with respect to foreign, state or * any reverse merger in which Meritage is the surviving entity but in which the beneficial ownership of securities possessing more than 50%local tax laws, or estate and gift tax considerations. VOTE REQUIRED Adoption of the total combined voting powerPlan requires approval by holders of Meritage's outstanding securities are transferred to holders different from those who held such securities immediately prior to such merger. To the extent that the plan is unaffected and assumed by the successor corporation or its parent company, a Corporate Transaction will have no effect onmajority of the outstanding optionsshares of Company Common Stock who are present, or represented, and the options shall continue in effect accordingentitled to their terms. Options which continue in effect shall be appropriately adjusted to account for the number and class of securities which would have been issued to the option holder in connection with the consummation of the Corporate Transaction had the option holder exercised the option immediately prior to the Corporate Transaction. Appropriate adjustments also shall be made to the exercise price of such options, provided that the aggregate exercise price shall remain the same. PLAN BENEFITS The following table provides information about the options that were outstanding under the 1997 Plan on March 31, 2000. The options granted have seven or ten-year terms, vest equally over five years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and have exercise prices ranging from $5.62 to $19.06 per share. The options granted to directors have seven of ten-year terms, vest equally over two years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and have exercise prices ranging from $5.62 to $14.25 per share. Grants under the plan are madevote thereon, at the discretionAnnual Meeting of the Board. Future grants are not yet determinable. INDIVIDUAL OF GROUP NAME NUMBER OF SHARES - ------------------------ ---------------- Executive Officers Mr. Hilton 30,000 Mr. Landon 30,000 Mr. Seay 32,500 Mr. Morgan 25,000 ------- All executive officers (4 persons) 117,500 All directors who are not executive officers (5 persons) 40,000 All employees other than executive officers (27 persons) 239,000 SECURITIES ACT REGISTRATION We intend to register the additional shares of common stock available for issuance under a Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Stockholders. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOUA VOTE FOR"FOR" APPROVAL OF THIS PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE MERITAGE CORPORATION STOCK OPTION PLAN. 2. INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS The firm ofAUDITORS KPMG LLP served as ourthe Company's principal independent public accounting firm and performed the audit of our financial statementsauditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999. A representative2000. The firm has been appointed as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2001. We expect representatives of KPMG will attend the annual meetingLLP to be present at our Annual Meeting to answer questions, and they will be given an opportunity to make a statement if he wishesthey wish to. AUDIT FEES The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for professional services rendered for the annual audit of the Company's financial statements and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company's Forms 10-Q for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 were $107,500. FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, KPMG LLP did not provide, directly or indirectly, any services relating to do so.the design or implementation of Meritage's information system, local area network, or any hardware or software system. ALL OTHER FEES The aggregate fees paid to KPMG LLP for professional services rendered for preparation of Meritage's state and federal income taxes during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 were $81,525. 16 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS The Board of Directors will consider nominations from stockholders for the class of directors whose terms expire at the year 20012002 Annual Meeting. Nominations must be made in writing to our Corporate Secretary, received at least 90 days prior to the 20012002 Annual Meeting, and contain sufficient background information concerning the nominee's qualifications. Our Corporate Secretary must receive any other stockholder proposals for the 20012002 Annual Meeting by December 19, 20002001 to be considered for inclusion in our 20012002 Proxy Statement. OTHER MATTERS The Board of Directors is not aware of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. If any other business should properly come before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote according to their best judgment. Meritage Corporation /s/ Larry W. Seay ---------------------------------------- Larry W. Seay Chief Financial Officer, Vice President-Finance, Secretary and Treasurer March 31, 2000 152001 17 EXHIBIT A MERITAGE CORPORATION STOCK OPTIONAUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER I. PURPOSE The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing: the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Corporation to any governmental body or the public; the Corporation's systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that management and the Board have established; and the Corporation's auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes generally. Consistent with this function, the Audit Committee should encourage continuous improvement of, and should foster adherence to the Corporation's policies, procedures and practices at all levels. The Audit Committee's primary duties and responsibilities are to: * Serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the Corporation's financial reporting process and internal control system. * Review and appraise the audit efforts of the Corporation's independent accountants and internal auditing department. * Provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, financial and senior management, the internal auditing department, and the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee will primarily fulfill these responsibilities by carrying out the activities enumerated in Section IV of this Charter. II. COMPOSITION The Audit Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors as determined by the Board, each of whom shall be independent directors, and free from any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment as a member of the Committee. The following Independence criteria (which is consistent with SEC and NYSE rules) shall apply to each Audit Committee member: * Employees. A director who is an employee (including non-employee executive officers) of the company or any of its affiliates may not serve on the Audit Committee until three years following the termination of his or her employment. In the event the employment relationship is with a former parent or predecessor of the company, the director could serve on the audit committee after three years following the termination of the relationship between the company and the former parent or predecessor. * Business Relationship. A director (i) who is a partner, controlling shareholder, or executive officer of the organization that has a business relationship with the company, or (ii) who has a direct business relationship with the company (e.g., a consultant) may serve on the Audit Committee only if the company's Board of Directors determines in its business judgment that the relationship does not interfere with the director's exercise of independent judgment. In making a determination regarding the independence of a director pursuant to this paragraph, the Board of Directors should consider, among other things, the materiality of the relationship to the company, to the director, and if applicable, to the organization with which the director is affiliated. "Business relationships" can include commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting and other relationships. A director can have this relationship directly with the company, or the director can be a partner, officer or employee or an organization that has such a relationship. The director may serve on the Audit Committee without the above-referenced Board of Directors' determination after three 18 years following the termination of, as applicable, either (1) the relationship between the organization with which the director is affiliated and the company, (2) the relationship between the director and his or her partnership status, shareholder interest or executive officer position, or (3) the direct business relationship between the director and the company. * Cross Compensation Committee Link. A director who is employed as an executive of another corporation where any of the company's executives serves on that corporation's Compensation Committee may not serve on the Audit Committee. * Immediate Family. A director who is an Immediate Family member of an individual who is an executive officer of the company or any of its affiliates cannot serve on the Audit Committee until after three years following the termination of such employment relationship. All members of the Committee shall have a working familiarity with basic finance and accounting practices, and at least one member of the Committee shall have accounting or related financial management expertise. Committee members may enhance their familiarity with finance and accounting by participating in educational programs conducted by the Corporation or an outside consultant. The members of the Committee shall be elected by the Board at the annual organizational meeting of the Board or until there successors shall be duly elected and qualified. Unless a Chair is elected by the full Board, the members of the Committee may designate a Chair by majority vote of the full Committee membership. III. MEETINGS The Committee shall meet at least four times annually, or more frequently as circumstances dictate. As part of its job to foster open communication, the Committee should meet at least annually with management and the independent accountants in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Committee or each of these groups believe should be discussed privately. In addition, the Committee or at least its Chair should meet with the independent accountants and management quarterly to review the Company's financial statements consistent with IV.3. below. IV. RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES To fulfill its responsibilities and duties the Audit Committee shall: DOCUMENTS/REPORTS REVIEW 1. Review and update this Charter periodically, at least annually, as conditions dictate. 2. Review the organization's annual financial statements and any reports or other financial information submitted to any governmental body, or the public, including any certification, report, opinion or review rendered by the independent accountants. 3. Review the 10-Q with financial management and the independent accountants, if necessary, prior to its filing or prior to the release of earnings. The Chair of the Committee may represent the entire Committee for purposes of this review. INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 4. Recommend to the Board of Directors the selection of the independent accountants, considering independence and effectiveness and approve the fees and other compensation to be paid to the independent accountants. On an annual basis, the Committee should review and 19 discuss with the accountants all significant relationships the accountants have with the Corporation to determine the accountants' independence. 5. Review the performance of the independent accountants and approve any proposed discharge of the independent accountants when circumstances warrant. 6. Periodically consult with the independent accountants out of the presence of management about internal controls and the fullness and accuracy of the organization's financial statements. FINANCIAL REPORTING PROCESSES 7. In consultation with the independent accountants, review the integrity of the organization's financial reporting processes, both internal and external. 8. Consider the independent accountant's judgments about the quality and appropriateness of the Corporation's accounting principles as applied in its financial reporting. 9. Consider and approve, if appropriate, major changes to the Corporation's auditing and accounting principles and practices as suggested by the independent accountants or management. PROCESS IMPROVEMENT 10. Establish regular and separate systems of reporting to the Audit Committee by each of management and the independent accountants any significant judgments made in management's preparation of the financial statements and the view of each as to appropriateness of such judgments. 11. Following completion of the annual audit, review separately with each of management and the independent accountants any significant difficulties encountered during the course of the audit, including any restrictions on the scope of work or access to required information. 12. Review any significant disagreements among management and the independent accountants in connection with the preparation of the financial statements. 13. Review with the independent accountants and management the extent to which changes or improvements in financial or accounting practices, as approved by the Audit Committee, have been implemented. (This review should be conducted at an appropriate time subsequent to implementation of changes or improvements, as decided by the Committee.) ETHICAL AND LEGAL COMPLIANCE 14. Review and update periodically the company's employee handbook as it pertains to ethical conduct and ensure that management has established a system to enforce these policies. 15. Review management's monitoring of the Corporation's compliance with the organization's conduct policies, and ensure that management has the proper review system in place to ensure that Corporation's financial statements, reports and other financial information disseminated to governmental organizations, and the public, satisfy legal requirements. 16. Review, with the organization's counsel, legal compliance matters including corporate securities trading policies. 17. Review, with the organization's counsel, any legal matter that could have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements. 18. Perform any other activities consistent with this Charter, the Corporation's By-laws and governing law, as the Committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate. 20 EXHIBIT B MERITAGE CORPORATION 2001 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN ARTICLE 1. ESTABLISHMENT, AND PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS. a. The Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan") ofDURATION 1.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLAN. Meritage HomesCorporation (the "Company") is hereby adopted. The Option Plan shall provide forestablishes an annual incentive plan to be known as the issuance of incentive stock options ("ISOs") and nonqualified stock options ("NSOs""Meritage Corporation 2001 Executive Management Incentive Plan" (the "Plan"). b.1.2 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN. The purpose of this Option Plan is designed to promote(i) recognize and reward on an annual basis select Company executives for their contributions to the long-termoverall success of the Company, and (ii) qualify compensation paid under the Plan as "performance-based compensation" as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") and the regulations thereunder. 1.3 DURATION OF THE PLAN. Subject to approval by attracting, motivatingthe Company's stockholders, the Plan will commence as of January 1, 2001. If the Plan is not approved by the Company's stockholders, the Plan will not be effective and retaining key executives, consultants and directors (the "Participants") throughany grants made under the use of competitive long-term incentives which are tiedPlan prior to stockholder interests by providing incentivesthat date will be void. The Plan shall terminate on December 31, 2005. No award may be made under the Plan after the date the Plan terminates, but awards made prior to the Participantsthat date may extend beyond that date. ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION 2.1 DEFINITIONS. Whenever used in the form of stock options which offer rewards for achievingPlan, the long-term strategicfollowing terms shall have the meanings set forth below and, financial objectiveswhen the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the Company. c. The Option Planword is intended to provide acapitalized: a. "Award" means whereby Participants may be given an opportunity to purchase shares of Stock (as defined herein)the agreement of the Company pursuant to (i) options which may qualify as ISOs under Section 422pay compensation to a Participant upon the attainment of specified Performance Goals. b. "Award Agreement" means the written agreement evidencing the terms and conditions of an Award. c. "Board" or "Board or Directors" means the Board of Directors of Meritage Corporation. d. "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"),from time to time. e. "Committee" means the Compensation Committee of the Board or (ii) NSOsthe committee appointed by the Board pursuant to Article 3 to administer the Plan. f. "Company" means Meritage Corporation, or any successor thereto. g. "Covered Employee" means an Employee who is a "covered employee" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. h. "Director" means any individual who is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company. i. "Employee" means any full-time, nonunion employee of the Company. Directors who are not otherwise employed by the Company shall not be considered Employees under this Plan. j. "Participant" means a Covered Employee who is designated by the Committee to participate in the Plan for a Performance Period pursuant to Article 4. k. "Performance Criteria" means the criteria that the Committee selects for purposes of establishing the Performance Goal or Performance Goals for a Participant for a Performance Period. The Performance Criteria that will be used to establish Performance Goals are limited to the following: pre- or after-tax net earnings, revenue growth, operating 21 income, operating cash flow, return on net assets, return on shareholders' equity, return on assets, return on capital, Share price growth, shareholder returns, gross or net profit margin, earnings per Share, price per Share, and market share, any of which may not so qualify. d.be measured either in absolute terms, or as compared to any incremental increase, or as compared to results of a peer group. The term "Affiliates" as used in this Option Plan means parent or subsidiary corporations, as defined inCommittee shall, within the time prescribed by Section 424(e) and (f)162(m) of the Code, (but substituting "the Company"define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the Performance Criteria it selects to use for "employer corporation"), including parentssuch Performance Period for such Participant. l. "Performance Goals" means, for a Performance Period, the goals established in writing by the Committee for the Performance Period based upon the Performance Criteria. Depending on the Performance Criteria used to establish such Goal, the Goal may be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or subsidiaries which become such after adoptionthe performance of an operating unit, division, or community. The Committee, in its discretion, may, within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the OptionCode, adjust or modify the calculation of Performance Goals for such Performance Period in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants, (i) in the event of, or in anticipation of, any unusual or extraordinary corporate item, transaction, event, or development; and (ii) in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any other unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business conditions. m. "Performance Period" means the one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and overlapping durations, as the Committee may select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a Participant's right to, and the payment of, compensation under the Plan. 2.n. "Shares" means the shares of common stock of Meritage Corporation. 2.2 SEVERABILITY. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines that any portion of this Plan is in violation of any statute, common law, or public policy, then only the portions of this Plan that violate such statute, common law, or public policy shall be stricken. All portions of this Plan that do not violate any statute or public policy shall continue in full force and effect. Further, any court order striking any portion of this Plan shall modify the stricken terms as narrowly as possible to give as much effect as possible to the intentions of the parties under this Plan. ARTICLE 3. ADMINISTRATION 3.1 THE COMMITTEE. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, or by any other Committee appointed by the Board consisting of not less than two Directors who qualify as "outside directors" under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by, and shall serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. 3.2 AUTHORITY OF THE PLANCOMMITTEE. The Committee shall have all the authority that is necessary or helpful to enable it to discharge its responsibilities under the Plan. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, the Committee shall have the exclusive right to interpret the Plan, to determine eligibility for participation in the Plan, to decide all questions concerning eligibility for and the amount of Awards payable under the Plan, to establish and administer the Performance Goals and certify whether, and to what extent, they are attained, to cancel and reissue any Awards granted hereunder in the event the Award lapses for any reason (provided that the Committee shall not have the authority to re-price previously issued and currently outstanding Awards without shareholder approval), to construe any ambiguous provisions of the Plan, to correct any default, to supply any omission, to reconcile any inconsistency, to issue administrative guidelines as an aide to the administration of the Plan, to make regulations for carrying out the Plan, and to decide any and all questions arising in the administration, interpretation, and application of the Plan. 22 3.3 DECISIONS BINDING. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and all related orders or resolutions of the Board of Directors shall be final, conclusive, and binding on all persons, including the Company, its stockholders, Employees, Participants, and their estates and beneficiaries. 3.4 SECTION 162(m) COMPLIANCE. This Plan shall be administered to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code and, if any provisions of the Plan cause any Award to not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, that provision shall be stricken from this Plan, but the other provisions of this Plan shall remain in effect. Any action striking any portion of this Plan shall modify the stricken terms as narrowly as possible to give as much effect as possible to the intentions of the parties under this Plan. Furthermore, if any portion of the Plan or any Award Agreement conflicts with Section 162(m) or the regulations issued thereunder, the provisions of Section 162(m) and such regulations shall control. ARTICLE 4. ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION 4.1 ELIGIBILITY. Participation is limited in any fiscal year to Employees who the Committee concludes will be Covered Employees for such year. 4.2 ACTUAL PARTICIPATION. From among the Covered Employees eligible to participate each year, the Committee may select those to receive Awards in any one or more Performance Periods under the Plan. ARTICLE 5. FORM OF AWARDS Awards shall be paid in cash. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, subject any Award to such terms, conditions, restrictions, or limitations (including but not limited to restrictions on transferability, vesting, termination of employment for cause or otherwise, or change of control) that the Committee deems to be appropriate, provided that such terms are not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan or Section 162(m) of the Code. All Awards will be evidenced by an Award Agreement. ARTICLE 6. DETERMINATION AND LIMITATION OF AWARDS 6.1 DETERMINATION OF AWARDS. Within the time prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code for each Performance Period, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine and establish: a. THE OPTION PLAN SHALL BE ADMINISTERED BY MEMBERSthe Performance Goals applicable to the Performance Period for each Participant; b. the total dollar amount payable to each Participant under the Award based upon attaining the Performance Goals; and c. such other terms and conditions of such Award as the Committee determines to be appropriate under the circumstances. Such determinations shall be reflected in the minutes of a Committee meeting, or in a written action adopted without the necessity of a meeting, and also shall be documented in the Award Agreement. 6.2 LIMITATIONS OF THE BOARDAWARDS. If only one Performance Goal is established for a Performance Period, the Performance Goal for such Performance Period must be achieved in order for a Participant to receive payment for an Award for such Performance Period. If more than one Performance Goal is established for a Performance Period, one or more of the Performance Goals for such Performance Period must be achieved in order for a Participant to receive payment for an Award for such Performance Period, all as set forth in accordance with the terms of the Award Agreement. Furthermore, the Committee is authorized at any time during or after a Performance Period to reduce or eliminate (but not to increase) the amount of an Award payable to any Covered Employee for a Performance Period for any reason. 23 6.3 MAXIMUM AWARDS. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, the maximum Award payable to any Covered Employee under the Plan for a Performance Period shall be $3,000,000.00. 6.4 EMPLOYMENT CONTINUATION. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, provided in the Award Agreement, or required by applicable law, no payment pursuant to this Plan shall be made to a Participant unless the Participant is employed by the Company on the last day of the Performance Period. 6.5 DEFERRAL OF DIRECTORSPAYMENTS. In the exercise of its discretion, the Committee may allow a Participant to elect to defer the receipt of all or any portion of an Award. Such deferral shall be made pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in any deferred compensation plan or arrangement adopted by the Company. ARTICLE 7. RIGHTS OF THE COMPANY (THE "BOARD") QUALIFYING AS "NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS" AS SUCH TERM IS DEFINED IN RULE 16B-3 PROMULGATED BY THE SECURITIESEMPLOYEES 7.1 EMPLOYMENT. Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate any Participant's employment at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ of the Company. 7.2 PARTICIPATION. No Employee shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award. ARTICLE 8. AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION"). b. THE COMMITTEE SHALL CONSIST ENTIRELY OF DIRECTORS QUALIFYING AS "NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS" AS SUCH TERM IS DEFINED IN RULE 16B-3 PROMULGATED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION"). MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE SHALL SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THE BOARD. c.TERMINATION The BOARDCommittee may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time with or without prior notice. In addition, the Committee may from time to time determine which employeesand with or without prior notice, amend or modify the Plan in any manner, but may not without shareholder approval adopt any amendment that would require the vote of shareholders of the Company or its Affiliates or other individuals or entities (each an "option holder")pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code. ARTICLE 9. WITHHOLDING The Company shall be granted options underhave the Option Plan, the terms thereof (including without limitation determining whether the option is an incentive stock optionpower and the times at whichright to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the options shall become exercisable),Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes (including the numberParticipant's FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any grant, exercise, or payment made under or as a result of shares of Stock for which an option or options may be granted. d. If rightsthis Plan. ARTICLE 10. SUCCESSORS All obligations of the Company to repurchase Stock are imposed, the Board OR THE COMMITTEE may, in its sole discretion, accelerate, in whole or in part, the time for lapsing of any rights of the Company to repurchase shares of such Stock or forfeiture restrictions. e. If rights of the Company to repurchase Stock are imposed, the certificates evidencing such shares of Stock awarded hereunder, although issued in the name of the option holder concerned, shall be held by the Company or a third party designated by the BOARD in escrow subject to delivery to the option holder or to the Company at such times and in such amounts as shall be directed by the Board under the terms of this Option Plan. Share certificates representing Stock that is subjectPlan, with respect to repurchase rights shall have imprinted or typed thereon a legend or legends summarizing or referring to the repurchase rights. 16 f. The Board OR THE COMMITTEE shall have the sole authority, in its absolute discretion, to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations, consistent with the provisions of the Option Plan, as, in its opinion, may be advisable in the administration of the Option Plan, to construe and interpret the Option Plan, the rules and regulations, and the instruments evidencing optionsAwards granted under the Option Plan and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Option Plan. All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the BOARDhereunder, shall be binding on all option holders under the Option Plan. 3. STOCK SUBJECT TO THE PLAN a. "Stock" shall mean Common Stock of the Company or such stock as may be changed as contemplated by Section 3(c) below. Stock shall include shares drawn from either the Company's authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock or from reacquired shares of Common Stock, including without limitation shares repurchased by the Company in the open market. THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK THAT CAN BE ISSUED UNDER THIS OPTION PLAN IS 775,000 SHARES, AND THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK THAT CAN BE ISSUED TO ANY ONE PERSON UNDER THIS OPTION PLAN IS 100,000 SHARES. b. Options may be granted under the Option Plan from time to time to eligible persons. Stock options awarded pursuant to the Option Plan which are forfeited, terminated, surrendered or canceled for any reason prior to exercise shall again become available for grants under the Option Plan (including any option canceled in accordance with the cancellation regrant provisions of Section 6(f) herein). c. If there shall be any changes in the Stock subject to the Option Plan, including Stock subject to any option granted hereunder, through merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization, reincorporation, stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of the Company's Stock or other similar events, an appropriate adjustment shall be made by the BOARD in the number of shares of Stock. Consistent with the foregoing, in the event that the outstanding Stock is changed into another class or series of capital stock of the Company, outstanding options to purchase Stock granted under the Option Plan shall become options to purchase such other class or series and the provisions of this Section 3(c) shall apply to such new class or series. d. The aggregate number of shares of Stock approved by the Option Plan may not be exceeded without amending the Option Plan and obtaining stockholder approval within twelve months of such amendment. 4. ELIGIBILITY Persons who shall be eligible to receive stock options granted under the Option Plan shall be those individuals and entities as the BOARD in its discretion determines should be awarded such incentives given the best interests of the Company; provided, however, that (i) ISOs may only be granted to employees of the Company and its Affiliates and (ii) any person holding capital stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of Stock of the Company or any Affiliate shall not be eligible to receive ISOs unless the exercise price per share of Stock is at least 110% of the fair market value of the Stock on the date the option is granted. 5. EXERCISE PRICE FOR OPTIONS GRANTED UNDER THE PLAN a. All ISOs and the majority of NSOs will have option exercise prices per option share not less than the fair market value of a share of the Stock on the date the option is granted, except that in the case of ISOs granted to any person possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Affiliate the price shall be not less than 110% of such fair market value. The price of ISOs or NSOs granted under the Option Plan shall be subject to adjustment to the extent provided in Section 3(c) above. 17 b. The fair market value on the date of grant shall be determined based upon the closing price on an exchange on that day or, if the Stock is not listed on an exchange, on the average of the closing bid and asked prices in the Over the Counter Market on that day. 6. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS a. Each option granted pursuant to the Option Plan shall be evidenced by a written stock option agreement (the "Option Agreement") executed by the Company and the person to whom such option is granted. The Option Agreement shall designate whether the option is an ISO or an NSO. b. The term of each ISO and NSO shall be no more than 10 years, except that the term of each ISO issued to any person possessing more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Affiliate shall be no more than 5 years. Subsequently issued options, if Stock becomes available because of further allocations or the lapse of previously outstanding options, will extend for terms determined by the Board or the Committee but in no event shall an ISO be exercised after the expiration of 10 years from the date of its grant. c. In the case of ISOs, the aggregate fair market value (determined as of the time such option is granted) of the Stock to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by such individual during any calendar year (under this Option Plan and any other plans of the Company or its Affiliates if any) shall not exceed the amount specified in Section 422(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, or any successor provision in effect at the time an ISO becomes exercisable. d. The Option Agreement may contain such other terms, provisions and conditions regarding vesting, repurchase or other provisions as may be determined by the Committee. To the extent such terms, provisions and conditions are inconsistent with this Option Plan, the specific provisions of the Option Plan shall prevail. If an option, or any part thereof, is intended to qualify as an ISO, the Option Agreement shall contain those terms and conditions, which the Committee determines, are necessary to so qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. e. The BOARD shall have full power and authority to extend the period of time for which any option granted under the Option Plan is to remain exercisable following the option holder's cessation of service as an employee, director or consultant, including without limitation cessation as a result of death or disability; provided, however, that in no event shall such option be exercisable after the specified expiration date of the option term. f. As a condition to option grants under the Option Plan, the option holder agrees to grant the Company the repurchase rights as the Company may at its option require and as may be set forth in a separate repurchase agreement. Any option granted under the Option Plan may be subject to a vesting schedule as provided in the Option Agreement and, except as provided in this Section 6 herein, only the vested portion of such option may be exercised at any time during the Option Period. All rights to exercise any option shall lapse and be of no further effect whatsoever immediately if the option holder's service as an employee is terminated for "Cause" (as hereinafter defined) or if the option holder voluntarily terminates the option holder's service as an employee. The unvested portion of the option will lapse and be of no further effect immediately upon any termination of employment of the option holder for any reason. In the remaining cases where the option holder's service as an employee is terminated due to death, permanent disability, or is terminated by the Company (or its affiliates) without Cause at any time, unless otherwise provided by the Committee, the vested portion of the option will extend for a period of three (3) months following the termination of employment and shall lapse and be of no further force or effect whatsoever only if it is not exercised before the end of such three (3) month period. "Cause" shall be defined in an Employment Agreement between Company and option holder and if none there shall be "Cause" for termination if (i) the option holder is convicted of a felony, (ii) the option holder engages in any fraudulent or other dishonest act to the detriment of the Company, (iii) the option holder fails to report for work on a regular basis, except for periods of authorized absence or bona fide illness, (iv) the option holder misappropriates trade secrets, customer lists or other proprietary information 18 belonging to the Company, forwhether the option holder's own benefit or forexistence of such successor is the benefitresult of a competitor, (v) the option holder engages in any willful misconduct designed to harm the Companydirect or its stockholders,indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or (vi) the option holder fails to perform properly assigned duties. g. No fractional shares of Stock shall be issued under the Option Plan, whether by initial grants or any adjustments to the Option Plan. 7. USE OF PROCEEDS Cash proceeds realized from the sale of Stock under the Option Plan shall constitute general funds of the Company. 8. AMENDMENT, SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF PLAN a. The Board may at any time suspend or terminate the Option Plan, and may amend it from time to time in such respects as the Board may deem advisable provided that (i) such amendment, suspension or termination complies with all applicable state and federal requirements and requirements of any stock exchange on which the Stock is then listed, including any applicable requirement that the Option Plan or an amendment to the Option Plan be approved by the stockholders, and (ii) the Board shall not amend the Option Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of Stock subject to ISOs under the Option Plan or to change the description or class of persons eligible to receive ISOs under the Option Plan without the consent of the stockholders of the Company sufficient to approve the Option Plan in the first instance. The Option Plan shall terminate on the earlier of (i) tenth anniversary of the Plan's approval or (ii) the date on which no additional shares of Stock are available for issuance under the Option Plan. b. No option may be granted during any suspension or after the termination of the Option Plan, and no amendment, suspension or termination of the Option Plan shall, without the option holder's consent, alter or impair any rights or obligation under any option granted under the Option Plan. c. The BOARD, with the consent of affected option holders, shall have the authority to cancel any or all outstanding options under the Option Plan and grant new options having an exercise price which may be higher or lower than the exercise price of canceled options. d. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to permit a termination, modification or amendment adversely affecting the rights of any option holder under an existing option theretofore granted without the consent of the option holder. 9. ASSIGNABILITY OF OPTIONS AND RIGHTS Each ISO and NSO granted pursuant to this Option Plan shall, during the option holder's lifetime, be exercisable only by the option holder, and neither the option nor any right to purchase Stock shall be transferred, assigned or pledged by the option holder, by operation of law or otherwise, other than upon a beneficiary designation executed by the option holder and delivered to the Company or the laws of descent and distribution. 10. PAYMENT UPON EXERCISE Payment of the purchase price upon exercise of any option or right to purchase Stock granted under this Option Plan shall be made by giving the Company written notice of such exercise, specifying the number of such shares of Stock as to which the option is exercised. Such notice shall be accompanied by payment of an amount equal to the Option Price of such shares of Stock. Such payment may be (i) cash, (ii) by check drawn against sufficient funds, (iii) such other consideration as the BOARD, in its sole discretion, determines and is consistent with the Option Plan's purpose and applicable law, or (iv) any combination of the foregoing. Any Stock used to exercise options to purchase Stock (including Stock withheld upon the exercise of an option to pay the purchase price of the shares of Stock as to which the option is exercised) shall be valued in accordance with procedures established by the BOARD. If accepted by the Committee in its discretion, such consideration also may be paid through a broker-dealer sale and remittance procedure pursuant to which the option holder (i) shall provide irrevocable written instructions to a designated brokerage firm to effect the immediate sale of the purchased Stock and remit to the Company, out of the sale proceeds available on the settlement date, sufficient funds 19 to cover the aggregate option price payable for the purchased Stock plus all applicable Federal and State income and employment taxes required to be withheld by the Company in connection with such purchase and (ii) shall provide written directives to the Company to deliver the certificates for the purchased Stock directly to such brokerage firm in order to complete the sale transaction. 11. WITHHOLDING TAXES a. Shares of Stock issued hereunder shall be delivered to an option holder only upon payment by such person to the Company of the amount of any withholding tax required by applicable federal, state, local or foreign law. The Company shall not be required to issue any Stock to an option holder until such obligations are satisfied. b. The Board may, under such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, authorize an option holder to satisfy withholding tax obligations under this Section 11 by surrendering a portion of any Stock previously issued to the option holder or by electing to have the Company withhold shares of Stock from the Stock to be issued to the option holder, in each case having a fair market value equal to the amount of the withholding tax required to be withheld. 12. RATIFICATION This Option Plan and all options issued under this Option Plan shall be void unless this Option Plan is or was approved or ratified by (i) the Board; and (ii) a majority of the votes cast at a stockholder meeting at which a quorum representing at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Stock is (either in person or by proxy) present and voting on the Option Plan within twelve months of the date this Option Plan is adopted by the Board. No ISOs shall be exercisable prior to the date such stockholder approval is obtained. 13. CORPORATE TRANSACTIONS a. For the purpose of this Section 13, a "Corporate Transaction" shall include any of the following stockholder-approved transactions to which the Company is a party: (i) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving entity, except for a transaction the principal purpose of which is to change the State of the Company's incorporation; (ii) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company in liquidation or dissolutionCompany. ARTICLE 11. REQUIREMENTS OF LAW 11.1 REQUIREMENTS OF LAW. The granting of the Company; or (iii) any reverse merger in which the Company is the surviving entity but in which beneficial ownership of securities possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of the Company's outstanding securities are transferred to holders different from those who held such securities immediately prior to such merger. b. Upon the occurrence of a Corporate Transaction, if the surviving corporation or the purchaser, as the case may be, does not assume the obligations of the Company under the Option Plan, then irrespective of the vesting provisions contained in individual option agreements, all outstanding options shall become immediately exercisable in full and each option holder will be afforded an opportunity to exercise their options prior to the consummation of the merger or sale transaction so that they can participate on a pro rata basis in the transaction based upon the number of shares of Stock purchased by them on exercise of options if they so desire. To the extent that the Option Plan is unaffected and assumed by the successor corporation or its parent company a Corporate Transaction will have no effect on outstanding options and the options shall continue in effect according to their terms. c. Each outstanding option under this Option Plan which is assumed in connection with the Corporate Transaction or is otherwise to continue in effect shall be appropriately adjusted, immediately after such Corporate Transaction, to apply and pertain to the number and class of securities which would have been issued to the option holder in connection with the consummation of such Corporate Transaction had such person exercised the option immediately prior to such Corporate Transaction. Appropriate adjustments shall also be made to the option price payable per share, provided the aggregate option price payable for such securities shall remain the same. In addition, the class and 20 number of securities available for issuance under this Option Plan following the consummation of the Corporate Transaction shall be appropriately adjusted. d. The grant of options under this Option Plan shall in no way affect the right of the Company to adjust, reclassify, reorganize or otherwise change its capital or business structure or to merge, consolidate, dissolve, liquidate or sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets. 14. REGULATORY APPROVALS The obligation of the Company with respect to Stock issuedAwards under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or stock exchanges as may be required. 11.2 GOVERNING LAW. The Company reserves the right to restrict, in whole or in part, the delivery of Stock under the Plan, until such time as any legal requirements or regulations have been met relating to the issuance of Stock, to their registration or qualification under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, if applicable, or any applicable state securities laws, or to their listing on any stock exchange at which time such listing may be applicable. 15. NO EMPLOYMENT/SERVICE RIGHTS Neither the action of the Company in establishing this Option Plan, nor any action taken by the Board or the Committeeand all agreements hereunder, nor any provision of this Option Plan shall be construed so as to grant any individual the right to remain in the employ or service of the Company (or any parent, subsidiary or affiliated corporation) for any period of specific duration, and the Company (or any parent, subsidiary or affiliated corporation retaining the services of such individual) may terminate or change the terms of such individual's employment or service at any time and for any reason, with or without cause. 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. The provisions of this Option Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Arizona, as such laws are applied to contracts entered into and performed in such State, without regard to its rules concerning conflicts of law. b. The provisions of this Option Plan shall insure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the Company and its successors or assigns, whether by Corporate Transaction or otherwise, and the option holders, the legal representatives of their respective estates, their respective heirs or legatees and their permitted assignees. c. The option holders shall have no dividend rights, voting rights or any other rights as a stockholder with respect to any options under the Option Plan prior to the issuance of a stock certificate for such Stock. d. If there is a conflict between the terms of any employment agreement pursuant to which options under this Plan are to be granted and the provisions of this Plan, the terms of the employment agreement shall prevail. 21 PROXY PROXY MERITAGE CORPORATION FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - MAY 10, 2000 The undersigned hereby appoints John R. Landon and Steven J. Hilton, or either one of them acting in the absence of the other with full powers of substitution, the true and lawful attorneys and proxies for the undersigned and to vote, as designated below, all shares of Common Stock of Meritage Corporation that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held an Wednesday, May 10, 2000, at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, at the University Club, Dallas, Texas 75240 and at any and all adjournments thereof, and to vote all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote, if then and there personally present, an the matters set forth below. Unless otherwise marked, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of director nominees and FOR Proposal No. 2. YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT: PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. FOLD AND DETACH HERE Please mark your vote as [X] indicated in this example WITHHELD FOR FOR ALL FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 1. ELECTION OF CLASS I DIRECTORS: [ ] [ ] 2. TO APPROVE AMENDMENT TO COMPANY'S [ ] [ ] [ ] VOTE FOR nominees listed below 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN William W. Cleverly THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS Steven J. Hilton YOU SPECIFY ABOVE. IF NO SPECIFIC VOTING DIRECTIONS ARE Raymond Oppel GIVEN YOU, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE LISTED PROPOSAL AND, BY WITH RESPECT TO SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS WITHHELD FOR: (Write that nominees' name MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING, IN ACCORDANCE in the space provided below) WITH THE DISCRETION OF THE APPOINTED PROXY. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY. ______________________________________________
Signature _____________________ Signature _____________________ Date _________ Please sign exactly as name(s) appear herein. If acting as an executor, administrator, trustee, custodian, guardian, etc., you should so indicate in signing. If the stockholder is a corporation, please sign the fall corporate name, by a duly authorized officer. If shares are held jointly, each stockholder named should sign. FOLD AND DETACH HEREMaryland. 25